Skip to content
Posters of the film Anita
Posters of the film Anita

News -

Who owns the IP rights to HK icon Anita Mui’s life and legacy?

Anita, a biopic about Hong Kong pop icon Anita Mui, drew critical praise and achieved commercial success when it was released last year. However, the movie has also sparked litigation from the late entertainer’s brother, who claims that the film’s production company has infringed on his rights over two registered trademarks.

According to the South China Morning Post, Peter Mui, Anita’s elder brother, registered two trademarks – which relate to precious metals, jewellery and time instruments – in his sister’s Chinese and English names after her death.

He alleges that these trademarks were used by the production company “without his authorisation in the production, promotion and content of the film”.

In 2018, he also applied for defensive trademarks that cover computer and scientific devices, printed matter, leather goods, clothing and advertising, and entertainment and cultural activities. This application is still being processed.

A defensive trademark is typically used to prevent a distinctive, famous, or even unique trademark from being used for unrelated goods or services.

The fact that trademarks are being brought up in a debate about a superstar’s life story seems relatively unusual. While family members of such film subjects, and the subjects themselves if they are still alive, are often consulted for such projects, many biopics do not seek such approval.

That’s because no one actually owns the copyright to their life, as entertainment lawyer Christopher Schiller puts it.

What we do have are what he terms reputational rights, such as the right to privacy and the rights of publicity. These, combined with laws related to libel and defamation, give an individual legal protection when it comes to the unauthorised commercial use of their name, likeness, and, yes, life story.

In the US context, freedom of expression is a constitutional right and thus a film-maker is allowed to make a movie about somebody else’s life story. However, if the subject feels that his reputational rights have been infringed upon, he may pursue legal action.

That's where the concept of "life rights" comes into play. “If you want to promote your film by using the subject’s name and likeness, it is in your best interest to secure their life rights in order to avoid legal action”, advises Romano Law. “When a person sells their life’s story rights, they are giving someone else permission to tell their story and promising that they will not sue that person for invasion of privacy, defamation or other potential claims.”

PitchMark helps innovators deter idea theft so that clients get the idea but don’t take it. Visit PitchMark.net and register for free here https://pitchmark.net/client/register.php

Topics

Categories

Contacts

Mark Laudi

Mark Laudi

Press contact Managing Partner (+65) 6223 2249

Related content

Images from Candace Bushnell's Facebook page (left) and HBO Max's Facebook page

Sex and the City author Candace Bushnell's evolving strategies for her IP

The Sex and the City franchise is set for yet another go at the zeitgeist via a 10-episode series titled And Just Like That. Leading ladies Sarah Jessica Parker, Cynthia Nixon and Kristin Davis are reprising their roles, while Kim Cattrall is not returning this time. But while this core four are probably most associated with Sex and the City these days, it is author Candace Bushnell who made this

Image from official House of Gucci website

Gucci protects its IP fiercely, but plays a different game for the IP of others

With the movie House of Gucci opening this week, the Italian fashion house is in the spotlight for the passionate vendettas that occurred back when the company was a family-owned business. The current Gucci, however, is now owned by a French luxury-goods conglomerate, and it knows a good branding opportunity when it sees one. The company opened up its archives to the movie’s production team, and t

Image from VERIFY

Deepfake of Ukraine’s Zelenskyy shows that IP laws governing such tech is urgently needed

Recently, a video featuring a deepfake version of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy appeared on social media, asking his troops to surrender in the ongoing war with Russia.
The video was quickly identified as a fake, partly due to its poor quality. Zelenskyy also swiftly posted a video of himself exposing the deepfake, and Facebook, YouTube and Twitter announced they had removed the vide

Image courtesy: Twitter

Indian historian Vikram Sampath embroiled in plagiarism row

Indian historian Vikram Sampath has been accused of plagiarism in an article written by him in 2017 as well as copying a passage in his two-volume biography on the Indian political leader Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.
In the first instance, a trio of USA-based historians and academics Rohit Chopra, Ananya Chakravarti and Audrey Truschke, highlighted multiple sentences from Sampath’s 2017 article wh

Let your clients get the idea, without taking it.

PitchMark deters idea theft and provides you with options if it happens.

PitchMark protects the expression of your original concepts, designs, proposals, business plans, creative pitches, music - in short, any idea that you conceived and published, and claim as your own. It gives you peace-of-mind by signalling to whoever you share it with that you are its creator, and that you wish to be respected as such.

If you receive or evaluate ideas or pitches, join PitchMark as a sign of your commitment to respect the Intellectual Property rights of their creators. Attract more in-depth pitches from a wider range of sources. Highlight your PitchMark membership in your Sustainability or CSR Report.

PitchMark